10 JanNo One Becomes a Calvinist in a Day

My blog here at blog.xpistou.com is fairly young, and I find it somewhat funny that my blog writing days were resurrected while our Friday Night Bible Study group was going through Romans 8 and is presently in Romans 9. I have since been fairly committed to writing on what I have been teaching through in Bible study, and I can imagine that there are some readers who do not know me (maybe even some who do) who are saying, “There is another one of those Calvinists who cannot get their heads out of Romans 9.” This is certainly not true of me and my writings, but I do not feel the need to convince anyone otherwise at this point.

That said, we had an excellent discussion last night in our Bible study on Romans 9:14-18. Of the ten or so people that we had, we found that we were pretty much of one accord with regards to the doctrine of this text, and we briefly discussed how we each arrived to such conclusions in different ways. What we found is, though we came to our present commonality at different times, that most of us came to our present convictions in a similar progression. I would think that this progression is similar in most who have come to the same conclusions about God’s sovereignty over the destiny of souls.

Read more…

09 JanIt Depends Not on Human Will, etc., 3. God Hardens Whom He Wills

We have, for the most part, up to this point viewed what some might call the positive aspects of Romans 9:14-18, i.e. the sovereign mercy of God. We have, with the apostle, looked as God’s declaration to Moses: “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,” and we have concluded with him that the mercy and salvation of God does not depend on the wills of men or on their works, but it depends solely on God who gives mercy. No man can commend himself to God on his deeds and his inclinations to worship the supernatural, for apart from God’s willing and sovereign intervention there is no right worship. For the prophet declares, “We all like sheep have gone astray; we all have turned, every one to his own way” (Is. 53:6).

It is with this knowledge that we come to our present text concerning the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Paul writes:

For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills (Romans 9:17, 18).

Read more…

08 JanIt Depends Not on Human Will or Exertion, but on God, Pt. 2

Paul’s interpretation of God’s declaration to Moses: “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy,” is possibly one of the most direct statements on a controversial topic in all of Scripture. He writes, “So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God who has mercy” (v. 9:16). Another version translates the text this way: “So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy” (NASB).

Before we come to any conclusions concerning this statement by the apostle, it would be beneficial for us to understand the context in which it is spoken. We have just finished studying God’s sovereign will over the selection of the Israel’s forefathers according to the Promise, which we have concluded from its context and from the fulfillment of the Promise in Christ that the apostle is speaking of the Eternal & Spiritual Israel, i.e. the children of God, not the physical Israel and its physical, covenant promises (cf. v. 9:8). The mercy of God of which the Apostle speaks is therefore not a mercy that affords physical prosperity for a particular nation and ethnic group but it is mercy unto eternal blessing.

Read more…

07 JanIt Depends Not on Human Will or Exertion, but on God, Pt. 1

In our study on God’s dealings with the children of Abraham and his sovereignty over them, we primarily addressed the lineage of the Promise. We looked at how God chose Isaac over the firstborn Ishmael to be the bearer of the Promise and how God chose Jacob over the firstborn Esau, before either of them were born and had done nothing good or evil, to demonstrate his purpose of election (cf. Rom. 9:11). We saw also that God’s choice brought with it eternal blessing to one and eternal ruin to the other (cf. Mal. 1:2, etc., Rom. 9:13).

It is at this point that many interpreters of Romans 9 who do not like the doctrine of Divine Election point out that vv. 1-13 have dealt solely with God and the people of Israel. In spite of Paul’s design in using the examples of Isaac and Jacob to explain God’s Purpose in Election and thereby explain why God has not broken his promise to Israel though they were not believing in Jesus Christ and are therefore condemned, many interpreters see, “God’s dealing with Israel” stamped over the text and skip ahead to Romans 12. They argue, “This text does not deal with the Church, so let us move on.”

Read more…

03 JanNot All Israel is Israel, III. Jacob I Love; Esau I Hated, Pt. 2

Continued from III. Jacob I Love; Esau I Hated, Pt. 1

While we as saints can somewhat comprehend that God loves us without merit and that he foreknew us in Christ before the foundation of the world, it is difficult for us to understand that God hates without merit. Our word hate, because of its human application, connotes reckless malice and scornful enmity, and God does not act in this way.

For our right understanding concerning God’s hate, it might be beneficial to draw an analogy: God’s hatred is as much an absence of salvific love as darkness is the absence of light. Upon some, God shines the glory and magnificence of his light thereby loving them, and from others he actively withholds it. The result of this active withholding is the absence of the light of his love which is tantamount to the darkness of his hate. Before the foundation of the world, God has chosen to shine this light upon some, which Scripture calls foreknowledge, and he has chosen not to shine it upon others—both according to his good pleasure.

Read more…

02 JanNot All Israel is Israel, III. Jacob I Loved; Esau I Hated, Pt. 1

Romans 9 is filled with hard and divisive texts, and there perhaps are none more hard than Paul’s quotation from Malachi 1:2, 3: “I have loved Jacob, but Esau I have hated.” But before we begin to explore the actual meaning of this text, let me preface this study by laying my hermeneutic before you. First, I believe that every word of Scripture is inspired by God through the Holy Spirit and therefore every hard saying and every doctrine that we encounter are divinely placed in Scripture for a particular end. Second, which is contingent upon the first, I do not water down texts, and I will not water down today’s text. God inspired the Prophet to write, “Esau I have hated,” and inspired the Apostle to quote from that text, and he did both without apology, and I will humbly do the same. If you disagree with my hermeneutic, please do not bother to attempt to argue with me on this subject, or any subject for that matter. I do believe that discussion and argument are edifying when done in love and truth, but if we have different hermeneutics (e.g. I believe Scripture is all Inspired revelation, and you believe that Scripture and tradition are equal revelation, et al.) discussion and argument are at most times futile and destructive.

With that said, in the present text we see that God loves one person and he hates another. Before we raise our hands to object, we must understand that God is not like us. He loves perfectly, and he loves differently than we love. We recognize this in Scripture, and we apply it to other actions and attributes of God. God judges perfectly, whereas we do not; God vindicates perfectly, he condemns perfectly, and he gives mercy and grace perfectly. Therefore, when we see in Scripture that God hates, we must recognize that his hate is as comparable to our hate as his love is to our love. He hates perfectly and without unjust malice, whereas we never hate rightly and never apart from perceived injustice or prejudice.

Read more…

26 NovA Preface to Romans 9: A Will Commanded by Love

And if my feet would go astray,
They cannot, for I know
That Jesus guides my falt’ring steps,
As joyfully I go (E. S. Hall, His Love Can Never Fail).

When we spoke yesterday on the fixed will of the unregenerate, we spoke nothing on their destination. This is partly due to the fact that their destination will be addressed in detail in Romans 9, and also it is assumed to be common knowledge that the wages of sin is death and this death is the final destination of unregenerate. The destination of the wicked could be much more complicated than this (if you wished to engage in the infralapsarian / supralapsarian debate), but it needs not be. Regardless of the timing of God’s decree of their damnation, the wicked will be judged for their deeds and condemned justly.

When we speak of the regenerate, however, we cannot speak of their destination apart from God’s decree, for we find that the two are intimately bound in Scripture. We find this truth most explicitly in the word predestine–a word that attempts to capture both the beginning and end of time in its parts. And when we speak of the predestination of the saints, there is no debate on its timing (as there is in the unregenerate), for Scripture makes it clear that God chose the saints in him before he created the world (cf. Eph. 1:4).

Also, when we speak of the predestination of the regenerate, we cannot speak of it rightly apart from the love of God. In the great chain of the sovereign works of God in the regenerate in Romans 8:29, 30, we see this at the beginning, “Those whom he foreknew, he predestined.” This foreknowledge of which the Apostle speaks is simply put, to know beforehand. This knowledge is not some mental assent to a creature’s eventual existence nor is it some feigned Arminian notion of God’s seeing a person’s faith before time began, but it is God’s choosing to set his love upon particular persons before the foundation of the world. This knowing is the same act of knowing that is seen in God’s declaration to Israel in Amos 3:2, “You only have I known of all the families of the earth.” This is made more clear in the declaration of Ephesians 1:5: “In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ.” In other words, the saint’s existence is preceded by the love of God and his destination is in the love of God.

Not only is the saint preceded and ended by the love of God, his present life is commanded by the love of God. This portion of the saint’s life brings us back to our topic of yesterday, namely the bondage of the human will. Just as the wills of the wicked are bound to evil deeds and thus their souls to destruction, the wills of the saints are bound to righteousness and their souls to life. And though Scripture is full of exhortations to the Christian to live according the Spirit, to live not according to flesh, to mortify the deeds of the body, etc., these exhortations do not negate the sovereign and providential hand of God in the life of the saint. The Apostle reveals this truth in Philippians 2:12, writing, “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure. The exhortation to work out one’s salvation or to do good deeds is never apart from the sovereign working of God in the saint.

The objections to this doctrine (as are most objections to orthodoxy) are derived from the experiences of certain individuals rather than from Scripture. The chief objection is found in the so-called “fleshly” or “carnal Christian.” These carnal Christians are those who have made professions of faith in the past, or, more likely, grew up in the Church, and now live lives that make no demonstration of the power of the Spirit. They might have lives that are characterized by drunkenness, sexual immorality, or even apathy to the Gospel, but these are saved by some concocted doctrine of eternal security. Those who profess such a doctrine pay no heed to the Apostle’s warning in Romans 8, “If you live according to the flesh you will die,” or to the declaration of James in his letter, “Faith without works is dead.” Those who believe in the existence of carnal Christians make light of the transformation wrought by God in the regenerate and of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Righteousness in the Christian life to them is a free will choice, just as their belief in the Gospel was, which explains its lack of Power.

However, the necessity of righteousness in the life of the saint is such that the Apostle writes in Romans 6:18, “Having been set free from sin, you are now slaves of righteousness.” He writes this reluctantly (as seen in the phrase “I am speaking in human terms” of v. 6:19) for he knows that he will be writing on the sonship of the saints and their freedom in Christ in Romans 8. Though reluctant, he writes of the saints in this way to make it clear that there are only two types of people in the world–those who present their members as slaves to impurity and to lawlessness leading to more lawlessness and those who present their members as slaves to righteousness leading to sanctification (cf. 6:19). For the freedom afforded by Christ is not freedom of the will to neutrality, but it is the freedom of the will from sin and death so that it might be bound to Another (cf. 8:2-4).

Therefore, as saints, our steps our bound to Christ and his righteousness and are directed by the Father’s loving and sovereign hand. Just as he predestined us in love to be glorified into the image of his Son, so now he works and wills his good pleasure in us and leads us through the good works that he has prepared for us beforehand (cf. Phil. 2:12, Eph. 2:10). All these things are a part of God’s glorious plan to accomplish for us our greatest good by making known the riches of his glory to us, his vessels of mercy.

25 NovA Preface to Romans 9: The Myth of the Free Will

Man comes out like a flower and withers;
….he flees like a shadow and continues not.
And do you open your eyes on such a one
….and bring me into judgment with you?
Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean?
….There is not one.
Since his days are determined,
….and the number of his months is with you,
……..and you have appointed his limits that he cannot pass (Job 14:2-5).

There are few philosophies that are as ingrained in the human psyche as is the free will of man. It is as common to the natural man as the craving for food, the desire for companionship, and the drive for sex. Left to himself, the natural man would believe in his autonomy his entire life and would die thinking that he arrived at his end on his own accord.

We, however, cannot come to Romans 9 as the natural man does. Before we begin studying this chapter, we must approach it with minds and hearts that are teachable. We must be willing to question our natural philosophies and also be willing to replace them with the doctrines of Scripture. If we do not, we will either come out of Romans 9 hating it, or more likely, will come out of it with ridiculous interpretations. Our best guide for studying Romans 9 is Romans 1-8, which lays a foundation for the hard teachings of the chapter. Since Romans 9 deals with God’s sovereignty over all men, we will look at his sovereignty over natural man and then his sovereignty over his children in these chapters.

The Bondage of Natural Men
Our first encounter with natural men is in the first chapter of Romans. The chapter portrays men whose morality is in constant attrition. Their moral attrition is attributed to nothing–not to their lack of education, their poverty, etc., but it is portrayed as their natural course forged by their natural condition. Not even their knowledge of God sways their destructive course. The Apostle writes:

For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things (Romans 1:21-23).

Though they knew God through the natural law, they also knew a portion of the revealed law of God. Again the Apostle writes:

Though they know God’s decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them (v. 1:32).

This is our first encounter in the letter with a will that knowingly fights against its soul’s own good. The Apostle writes that these natural men know their actions and their desserts, but they do them all the same. They know that they will ultimately answer for their wickedness, but they commend the wickedness that they see in others. They know that their good is not to do wicked acts, yet they continue to do them.

Lest we think that Paul is speaking only of the Gentiles apart from the law in chapter one, the Apostle clarifies this, writing, “Are we Jews any better off? No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin (v. 3:10).” Again he writes, “There is none who is righteous, no not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God (v. 3:11).” This universal “not doing good” speaks of the bondage of all men apart from God’s divine intervention. Apart from God, all men are bound to sin and can do no good. Though men might “will” to do things that resemble good, they are no more good than graven images are God. Regardless of how we explain or justify the “selfless” acts of good by natural men, the simple truth is that no man apart from God can do any that is truly good and is bound to do evil with every step he takes.

In that same chapter, the Apostle writes, “We know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God (v. 3:19).” As is implied in the first chapter, we find that the law exists over natural men, not to be a stepladder to God, but to demonstrate their guilt before a righteous Judge. In Romans 7, we see also that the law over natural man points to life to those who fulfill it. Since the natural man is bound to sin and unable to fulfill the law and thereby attain life, we find the natural narrator through the lens of the Apostle saying, “The very commandment that promised life proved to be death to me (v. 7:10).

In the next paragraph, we find the most vivid portrayal of the natural man’s bondage. In this paragraph, we find a narrative of man who recognizes that the law gives life to those who keep it, who desires that life, and, through the Apostle’s eyes, sees clearly his bondage to sin and his bondage to the flesh. Even in this most enlightened of natural men, we still find that his will is completely and utterly bound, for he laments, “For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to to do what is right [i.e. so that he might obtain life], but not the ability to carry it out. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I continually do (vv. 7:18, 19). Here we find that even the man who is enlightened by the law and its promises is powerless to keep it. Thus he needs a deliverer–one outside himself who is not bound by sin, death, and the flesh to keep the law on his behalf and to break his bonds. Hence we have Romans 8:1-4, but that is beyond our present scope.

Our point in looking at the utter bondage of natural men is so that when we read Romans 9:16, “So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy,” or v. 9:13, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated,” we will have categories for these declarations, and so that we will see that the declarations of Romans 9 are the same as those made in Romans 1-8. Tomorrow we will look at God’s sovereignty over redeemed men.

04 NovObama, McCain: Dust on the Footstool of King Jesus

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn born of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones, or dominions or rulers or authorites–all things were created through him and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent. For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross (Colossians 1:15-20).

Sometimes commentary just isn’t necessary.